India’s Stance on Venezuela: A Critical Analysis

India’s response to recent developments in Venezuela holds significant diplomatic weight. The Ministry of External Affairs has expressed deep concern, emphasizing peaceful dialogue, diplomatic relations, and the well-being of the Venezuelan people. This reaffirms India’s commitment to sovereignty and non-intervention, positioning the country at a pivotal moment.

As a constitutional democracy and a prominent voice in the Global South, India’s credibility hinges on consistency. The defense of sovereignty should not be selective, and strategic alliances should not compromise fundamental principles.

Silence or excessive caution in times of legal upheaval can be interpreted as acquiescence rather than neutrality. This is particularly crucial for the Global South, as what is tolerated in one state today may set a precedent for others in the future.

The preservation of international law relies not on the compliance of powerful nations but on the advocacy of influential middle powers. India’s historical opposition to external interference, its struggle against colonial rule, and its dedication to multilateralism impose a duty that transcends mere diplomatic convenience. Strategic autonomy should go beyond calculated silence to encompass principled engagement.

The central issue lies not in determining the guilt of Nicolas Maduro, as this should be left to an impartial, multilateral legal process rather than a unilateral decision. Instead, the focus should be on whether international law can maintain credibility when its procedures are overshadowed by strategic interests.